013 | |
| |
1975․전대련 (서울YMCA) | |
지역사회 개발을 위한 민간단체 참여에 관한 연구 | |
|
英文抄錄
제1장 서론
제1절 연구목적
제2절 연구방법 및 범위
제2장 지역사회개발의 일반이론
제1절 지역사회개발의 정의
제2절 지역사회개발의 필요성
제3절 지역사회개발의 역사적 배경
제4절 외국에서의 지역사회개발
제3장 한국의 지역사회개발사업
제1절 한국지역사회개발의 역사적고찰
제2절 새마을운동
제4장 YMCA의 지역사회개발 활동
제1절 YMCA의 역사적 배경
제2절 YMCA의 조직
제3절 YMCA의 목적과 사업
제4절 YMCA의 지역사회개발 활동
제5장 한국 지역사회개발의 문제점과 과업
제1절 일반적인 문제점과 과제
제2절 YMCA의 문제점과 과제
제6장 결론
참고문헌
1. A Study of Non-Government Body′s
2. Participation in the Community Development.
-With Special reference to YMCA Project.-
CHUN, DAI-LYUN
Major in Urban Administration
The graduate School of Public
Administration
Yonsei University
The term, The Community Development, has come to be used on a full scale from the early stage of the 19th century.
At first, the social education which was promoted by non-government bodies stirred up national concerns and it has been grown into the community development.
Although the beginning of the community development in Korea goes back to the Shilla Dynasty, this campaign neverthless began to take its root after the emancipation from Japanese invasion. Especially upon the opportunity of the establishing a Section Committee for the Community Development in the Joint Committee for the U.S.-Korea Economic Cooperation in November 1957, Our community movement began to be pushed forward under the guidance of Korean government on a nation-wide scale in the name of Saemaul Undong, or New Community Movement.
To be true, the community development in itself expects the people who live in their communities to build up prosperous villages under the spirit of their diligence, self-help and cooperation, but all the Korean communities were too poor in their financial and technical capacities to develop themselves, and they were in need of any form of external aids. Therefore, it has been the government responsibilities to guide and aid the movement.
Government, however, has not been concerned about the participation of non-government body in the Saemaul Movement, despite its assertion that all the national movements should be carried out by the villagers. In the other words, the community development will be successful in its activities, only when there is a positive participation of non-government bodies: that is, as many foreign examples, the community development has to be organized and be led by civilian leaders.
Besides these explicit facts, since these have been rigorous social strata in Korea they have shown a latent abhorrence to the ruling class, particularly the